Prompting & UX
226 ranked historical posts · 25.2% of represented canon
No matching collected community.
Older ranked records represented before 2026-07-30. Useful for prominence and memory—not total activity.
Newest records from 2026-07-30 to 2026-08-08. The boundary is inferred because original retrieval provenance was not stored.
Core views require at least 1,500 total records and 500 canon records; this corpus has 1,896 and 896. 1,896 records have enriched topic assignments.
226 ranked historical posts · 25.2% of represented canon
+19.0pp in the inferred recent pool versus canon
2.1× the recent contender rate · 4 contenders
Leading detected topic and ranked-record sample size for each represented year. Counts describe available evidence only; they are not activity levels.
The newest-post pool is filtered within age bands, then ranked by score and reply-count percentiles. Posts newer than 7 days are withheld when enough mature candidates exist.
Candidate index is relative to this recent pool, not a prediction of future quality or final Reddit rank.
Recent topic representation is compared with the ranked historical canon. This is a comparison between two sampling lenses—not a census of either period. Thin evidence stays on the Watchlist instead of receiving a directional label.
Swipe to compare every lens →
Every lens below uses only the inferred newest-post cohort from 2026-07-30 onward. They describe patterns inside that selected pool—not subreddit-wide prevalence.
Distinct-post frequency across 1,000 titles and 790 available bodies. High-information two-word frames lead; normalized domain terms remain expandable.
Per-post prevalence in 500 earlier versus 500 later posts · 790 bodies available. Minimum support removes one-off spikes.
Supported topics only. Monthly share, post volume, median Reddit score, and average upvote ratio keep frequency separate from platform attention; none measures accuracy or quality.
Boundary-aware phrase-marker rates across 1,000 titles and 790 available post bodies. Categories may overlap and describe language patterns—not author emotion.
curiosity: why, how, what, explain, understand, learn, curious, wonder, anyone know, thoughts on
frustration: broken, fails, failed, error, issue, problem, stuck, doesn't work, not working, frustrated, worse, unusable, bug
uncertainty: maybe, might, could, unsure, not sure, uncertain, possibly, seems, apparently, i think
excitement: amazing, awesome, excited, love, can't wait, incredible, finally, great, impressive, game changer, wow
urgency: urgent, asap, right now, immediately, today, deadline, breaking, just released, now available
appreciation: thanks, thank you, appreciate, helpful, grateful, shoutout, well done, great work, kudos
| Month | Curiosity | Frustration | Uncertainty | Excitement | Urgency | Appreciation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07 | 45.5% | 18.2% | 27.3% | 9.1% | 12.1% | 12.1% |
| 2026-08 | 48.0% | 14.5% | 19.5% | 9.1% | 9.2% | 4.4% |
Flair is the available proxy for content format. Monthly share shows when each label became more or less common; volume and platform response remain separate.
Posts in the inferred recent candidate pool are binned by Reddit score and upvote ratio. Brighter cells contain more selected posts; score uses a logarithmic scale.
1,000 recent candidates represented · relative platform response, not quality or subreddit-wide reach.
| Score band | Upvote-ratio band | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 0–0 | 0–10% | 1 |
| 0–0 | 10–20% | 30 |
| 0–0 | 20–30% | 77 |
| 0–0 | 30–40% | 79 |
| 0–0 | 40–50% | 81 |
| 0–0 | 50–60% | 67 |
| 0–1 | 50–60% | 30 |
| 2–3 | 50–60% | 13 |
| 3–5 | 50–60% | 5 |
| 5–7 | 50–60% | 5 |
| 7–11 | 50–60% | 2 |
| 11–16 | 50–60% | 1 |
| 16–23 | 50–60% | 1 |
| 0–1 | 60–70% | 70 |
| 2–3 | 60–70% | 37 |
| 3–5 | 60–70% | 7 |
| 5–7 | 60–70% | 20 |
| 7–11 | 60–70% | 4 |
| 11–16 | 60–70% | 7 |
| 16–23 | 60–70% | 4 |
| 23–33 | 60–70% | 3 |
| 33–47 | 60–70% | 1 |
| 67–95 | 60–70% | 1 |
| 95–136 | 60–70% | 1 |
| 136–193 | 60–70% | 1 |
| 193–275 | 60–70% | 1 |
| 275–392 | 60–70% | 1 |
| 2–3 | 70–80% | 36 |
| 3–5 | 70–80% | 16 |
| 5–7 | 70–80% | 18 |
| 7–11 | 70–80% | 7 |
| 11–16 | 70–80% | 12 |
| 16–23 | 70–80% | 6 |
| 23–33 | 70–80% | 5 |
| 33–47 | 70–80% | 4 |
| 47–67 | 70–80% | 2 |
| 67–95 | 70–80% | 6 |
| 95–136 | 70–80% | 3 |
| 136–193 | 70–80% | 2 |
| 193–275 | 70–80% | 4 |
| 275–392 | 70–80% | 1 |
| 392–557 | 70–80% | 1 |
| 792–1,125 | 70–80% | 1 |
| 2–3 | 80–90% | 12 |
| 3–5 | 80–90% | 10 |
| 5–7 | 80–90% | 24 |
| 7–11 | 80–90% | 6 |
| 11–16 | 80–90% | 11 |
| 16–23 | 80–90% | 3 |
| 23–33 | 80–90% | 6 |
| 33–47 | 80–90% | 3 |
| 47–67 | 80–90% | 7 |
| 67–95 | 80–90% | 6 |
| 95–136 | 80–90% | 8 |
| 136–193 | 80–90% | 6 |
| 193–275 | 80–90% | 4 |
| 275–392 | 80–90% | 4 |
| 392–557 | 80–90% | 1 |
| 557–792 | 80–90% | 4 |
| 1,125–1,600 | 80–90% | 2 |
| 1,600–2,273 | 80–90% | 4 |
| 0–1 | 90–100% | 66 |
| 2–3 | 90–100% | 47 |
| 3–5 | 90–100% | 5 |
| 5–7 | 90–100% | 7 |
| 7–11 | 90–100% | 9 |
| 11–16 | 90–100% | 3 |
| 16–23 | 90–100% | 4 |
| 23–33 | 90–100% | 6 |
| 33–47 | 90–100% | 2 |
| 47–67 | 90–100% | 4 |
| 67–95 | 90–100% | 2 |
| 95–136 | 90–100% | 8 |
| 136–193 | 90–100% | 3 |
| 193–275 | 90–100% | 4 |
| 275–392 | 90–100% | 7 |
| 392–557 | 90–100% | 5 |
| 557–792 | 90–100% | 5 |
| 792–1,125 | 90–100% | 2 |
| 1,125–1,600 | 90–100% | 2 |
| 1,600–2,273 | 90–100% | 4 |
| 2,273–3,231 | 90–100% | 3 |
| 3,231–4,591 | 90–100% | 2 |
| 4,591–6,524 | 90–100% | 2 |
| 6,524–9,271 | 90–100% | 2 |
| 13,175–18,721 | 90–100% | 1 |
Open the posts behind the interpretation. The score distribution is a diagnostic of this selected source set—not a model of the subreddit as a whole.
Collected posts grouped into Reddit score bands.
Collected records: 1,896
Represented range: 2022-12-11 → 2026-08-08
The corpus combines a broad newest-post listing with bounded top/year and top/all listings. The interface infers the recent boundary from the newest 1,000 records because original retrieval provenance was not stored.
Older records are analyzed as a ranked historical canon. They can show what was prominent and repeatedly surfaced within ranked retrieval; they cannot estimate total monthly activity, publishing habits, or whole-conversation prevalence.
Recent contender ranking compares posts within age bands using score and reply-count percentiles. Platform attention is not evidence quality, accuracy, representativeness, or future performance.